April 22nd, 2019
When we work with people, we have a hard time establishing methodological criteria. Although, theoretically, our studies and training emphasize the creation of profiles of specific young people, we must keep in mind that each person will continue to be unique and each one has to face empowerment processes in a different way.
On a theoretical level, all education professionals know that we must follow certain steps, but we must also know that these steps are completely modifiable. In fact, if something distinguishes education, it’s that it does not have a rigid structure, but rather, it
is sketched and transformed at the same pace that we learn and establish educational relationships. Education is a process that is built in parallel and is shared among educators, students, external agents, resources, etc., it’s not just knowledge that is transmitted unilaterally.
Obviously, it is important to have some training and a somewhat defined structure before initiating any educational activity. Personally, there are a series of steps that I always follow: first, I get rid of all the labels that can suppress the kid (labels that come from neighbourhoods, from school…) to try to ensure that they do not condition the way I interact with them. It’s very difficult because we live in the world full of labels, but precisely because of it, this
task distinguishes a good professional.
The second thing I always do is approach the young person in a personal way: talking to them one-to-one, trying to establish affective bonds and transmitting them a lot of emotionality.
From this point on, I could draw a structure with axes and phases that are very clearly defined, but if we understand the educational process as a shared process, inevitably the periods and phases get lengthened, shortened or even skipped. In the architecture of youth empowerment processes, we must stand up for flexibility, we should not be afraid of breaking schemes, tearing and redoing cards and, above all, we should not be afraid of making mistakes. Structures exist to be broken and no matter how much they served us once,
it’s possible that they will never serve us again, or that the structure will serve us to build another one or to realise that we shouldn’t use it. It’s positive to have structural references of very standardized processes, but in the end these only have to serve us to start building the process in a shared way, one-to-one, with each kid.